The Effectiveness of the USMCA Rapid Response Labour Mechanism

Conclusions from the Analysis of GM Silao, Tridonex, Panasonic, Teksid, VU Manufacturing and Saint Gobain cases

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61823/dpia.2025.2.347

Keywords:

the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, a facility-specific rapid response labour mechanism, labour law

Abstract

On 30 September 2018, the US, Canada and Mexico announced they had reached a trilateral free trade agreement in the renegotiation of the NAFTA, concluding more than 13 months of negotiations. The USMCA has been ratified by all three countries and has taken effect as of 1 July 2020. One of its crucial characteristics when it comes to workers’ rights is a facility-specific rapid response labour mechanism, which purpose is to ensure remediation of a “Denial of Rights” of free association and collective bargaining for workers at a Covered Facility, and to ensure that remedies are lifted immediately once a Denial of Rights is remediated (Annex 31-A “Facility-specific rapid response labor mechanism” between the US and Mexico of the USMCA’s Dispute Settlement chapter and separate Annex 31-B between Canada and Mexico). From 2021, the above-mentioned mechanism has been already used by the Department of Labor and the Office of the US Trade Representative on many occasions in order to protect workers’ rights under the USMCA. The author of this paper examines six first cases, namely: GM Silao, Tridonex, Panasonic, Teksid, VU Manufacturing and Saint Gobain. On such basis she draws conclusions regarding the effectiveness of the facility-specific rapid response labour mechanism.

References

Bureau of International Labor Affairs, <https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ilab/our-work/trade/labor-rights-usmca-cases>, “USMCA Cases”, accessed February 3, 2024.

Crossa M. and Cypher J.M., Behind the Virtuous Façade: The USMCA’s Restructuring of Mexico’s Labor Relations, “Dollars & Sense”, May/June 2021, Issue 354.

Cypher J.M. and Crossa M., Beyond the Myth and Through the Mexican Labyrinth: Labor under the “New NAFTA,” the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, “Dollars & Sense”, May/June 2019, Issue 342.

Office of the United States Trade Representative, <https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2020/march/ambassador-lighthizer-statement-canadas-approval-usmca>, “Ambassador Lighthizer Statement on Canada’s Approval of the USMCA”, accessed February 3, 2024.

Literature

Bates B., Examining Labour Rights Enforcement Mechanisms in NAFTA and the USMCA and Its Impact on Labour Conditions in Mexico, “Western Journal of Legal Studies” 2022, Vol. 13, Issue 1.

Bensusán Areous G. and Briseño Fabián L.P., The USMCA between the US and Mexico: A Step Towards More Sustainable Trade?, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Berlin 2022.

Blecker R.A., The Rebranded NAFTA: Will the usmca Achieve The Goals of the Trump Administration For North American Trade?, “Norteamérica: Revista Académica del CISAN-UNAM” 2021, Vol. 16, Issue 2. DOI: 10.22201/cisan.24487228e.2021.2.516.

Bonne W., Unresolved Labor Disputes under the USMCA's Rapid Response Mechanism: Probing the Applicability of the ATS in Light of Nestle v. Doe, “New York University Journal of Law and Business” 2022, Vol. 19, Issue 1.

Burfisher, M.E., Lambert F. and Matheson T., NAFTA to USMCA: What Is Gained?, International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C. 2019.

Compa L., Trump, Trade, and Trabajo: Renegotiating NAFTA’s Labor Accord in a Fraught Political Climate, “Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies” 2019, Vol. 26, Issue 1.

Compa L. and Brooks T., NAFTA and the NAALC: Twenty Years of North American Trade-Labour Linkage, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn 2015.

Corvaglia M.A., Labour Rights Protection and Its Enforcement under the USMCA: Insights from a Comparative Legal Analysis, “World Trade Review” 2021, Vol. 20, Issue 5. DOI:10.1017/S1474745621000239.

Covarrubias A.V., El T-MEC y la tercera generación de arreglos laborales. Los escenarios probables para el trabajo y la industria regional, “Norteamérica, revista académica del CISAN-UNAM” 2021, Vol. 16, Issue 1.

De Lourdes Castellanos Villalobos M., Libertad sindical en México. Aplicación de los convenios 87 y 98 de la OIT en relación con las obligaciones derivadas del T-mec, “Revista Vox Juris” 2023, Vol. 41, Issue 1. DOI: 10.24265/VOXJURIS.2023.v41n1.09.

Ocampo Merlo R.E., Reforma laboral en México: una reconstrucción de su negociación y sus potencialidades prácticas, “Espiral” 2023, Vol. 29, Issue 84.

Scherrer Ch., Novel Labour-related Clauses in a Trade Agreement: From NAFTA to USMCA, “Global Labour Journal” 2020, Vol. 11, Issue 3.

Tyc A., Global Trade, Labour Rights and International Law: A Multilevel Approach, Routledge, London, New York 2021.

VanDuzer J.A., Simons P. and Mayeda G., Integrating Sustainable Development into International Investment Agreements: A Guide for Developing Country Negotiators, Commonwealth Secretariat, London 2013.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

The Effectiveness of the USMCA Rapid Response Labour Mechanism: Conclusions from the Analysis of GM Silao, Tridonex, Panasonic, Teksid, VU Manufacturing and Saint Gobain cases. (2025). Discourse of Law and Administration, 2. https://doi.org/10.61823/dpia.2025.2.347